Irving v Penguin Books & Lipstadtcase 1996‑I‑1113 · QBD
7 documents
court of appeal

Application for permission to appeal

Following the trial judgment of 11 April 2000 and the costs order of 5 May 2000, Mr Irving applied to the Court of Appeal for permission to appeal. The hearing was 3½ days; Mr Adrian Davies of counsel appeared for Mr Irving (the application below was filed in person), with Mr Richard Rampton QC again for the respondents.

before Pill LJ · Mantell LJ · Buxton LJ  ·  decision 20 July 2001

— the outcome — Permission to appeal refused. The Court of Appeal found that the judge's findings on Irving's historiography were ones he was entitled to reach on the evidence, and that the case did not raise an arguable question of law warranting a full appeal. For what happened after this date, see After the verdict.
Skeleton
argument

Skeleton Argument of the Claimant (long form)

Adrian Davies

The principal skeleton. Argues (i) the judge’s findings on justification were against the weight of the evidence; (ii) the judge erred in admitting Evans’s evidence on the meaning of "Holocaust denier"; (iii) the judge erred in admitting van Pelt’s evidence on Auschwitz architecture and chemistry; and (iv) the judge erred in applying section 5 of the Defamation Act 1952.

~Apr 2001filed
191 paras
Skeleton
argument

Outline Skeleton (short form)

Richard Rampton

The condensed outline filed alongside the long skeleton. Same four grounds in summary form.

~Apr 2001filed
20 paras
Respondents’
skeleton

Adams Skeleton (Penguin Books Ltd, D1)

Nigel Barry Adams

The first respondent’s skeleton in answer. Addresses the applicant’s four grounds and supports the trial judge’s findings.

~May 2001filed
10 paras
Respondents’
skeleton

Bateman Skeleton (Lipstadt, D2)

Mark David Bateman

The second respondent’s skeleton in answer. Joins the Adams skeleton; adds particular submissions on the section 5 ground.

~May 2001filed
99 paras
Oral
argument

Argument before the Court of Appeal

Adrian Davies

The verbatim transcript of the oral argument. Davies addresses the Court for three days; Rampton for half a day; the Court delivers its decision orally on day four.

Jul 2001hearing
19 paras
Order

Order of the Court

Court of Appeal

The sealed order: permission to appeal refused; further directions on costs.

20 Jul 2001sealed
5 paras
Judgment

Judgment of the Court of Appeal

Lord Justice Pill

The Court’s reasoned judgment refusing permission. Reviews the trial judge’s findings on each of the four grounds of appeal and concludes that none discloses an arguable error.

20 Jul 2001 handeddown
103 paras
— note — Each document is reproduced in full from the trial archive. Internal links open the rendered text; the right-hand metadata records the filing party and any procedural detail.